(t3.preservice.org)
Corruption
freedom, human rights, pluralism and tolerance are, beyond doubt, values \u200b\u200bthat must defend, but with clarity.
With lucidity, I say, because the experience of other countries and ours, warns that these rights are often improperly used and go on to become badges of crime, economic connotations of a certain weight, becoming a boomerang that threatens the very existence of the rights of others to prevent the investigation, trial and punishment of illegal financial. Just think of bank secrecy, as an example. This is important in light of the comments we have been doing on abuse of law, power and economic strength linked to the most significant corruption.
Lucidity to defend freedom and fundamental rights of all
The insight to which I allude to diagnose the criminal phenomenon that concerns us today, more important, is complex. You can only opt historical processes: economic, social and, Ultimately, cultural, ranging characterize the mode of being of man in every time your walk on this earth. And decanting is not only slow by nature, but also guidance is deflected by the various interest groups, which are in force lobby and the media. Consider the daily flood of news about robberies and assaults or micrographic and in response the authorities urged to resolve "that" sectoral problem, the crime of marginals without pay equal attention to crimes influence us literally corrode country. Medial speeches, political and legislation are consistent in that blindness. The matter known as CORFO-Inverlink, or the Riggs case, screen or companies in tax havens and criminal, are not even in our country for a determined policy of prevention and defense against such "emerging" modern crimes much less provide for special agencies or ministries.
I believe that such insensitivity will damage, as has happened in countries as culturally developed as Spain and Italy, which has been around for a few years traveling the path of socio-economic debate on crime and illegal domestic financial and transnational, and his ties to corruption and the destiny of the state.
This lack or absence is precisely the scope of the State, its politics or not criminal policy for the better protection of the common good and in the field of production of norms, to be imposed (from overseas) to each individual as the current protocol and to the point of safeguarding the public interest.